RATING - Coder Ratings
Some of the more elite (and not-so-elite) coders around take part in a certain unnamed programming contest. In said contest, there are multiple types of competitions. Here, we consider the Open and High School competition types. For each type, each competitor receives a rating, an integer between 1 and 100000, inclusive. A coder's rating is based upon his or her level of performance in matches and is calculated using a complicated formula which, thankfully, you will not be asked to implement.
Although the Open and High School ratings for a coder who has participated in both competition types lately are usually close, this is not always the case. In particular, High School matches are more about speed, since many coders are able to solve all the problems, whereas Open matches require more thinking and there is a steeper curve in terms of problem difficulty.
You are given N coders (1 ≤ N ≤ 300000), conveniently numbered from 1 to N. Each of these coders participates in both High School and Open matches. For each coder, you are also given an Open rating Ai and a High School rating Hi. Coder i is said to be better than coder j if and only if both of coder i's ratings are greater than or equal to coder j's corresponding ratings, with at least one being greater. For each coder i, determine how many coders coder i is better than.
On the first line of input is a single integer N, as described above.
N lines then follow. Line i+1 contains two space-separated integers, Ai and Hi.
Line i should contain the number of coders that coder i is better than.
8 1798 1832 862 700 1075 1089 1568 1557 2575 1984 1033 950 1656 1649 1014 1473
6 0 2 4 7 1 5 1
Is there a way to get the failed test case ? I'm getting wrong answer and I must have missed some corner case.
For those getting WA at around 9, check
For those getting WA on 9th test case :
are there duplicate < rank1, rank2 > pairs?Last edit: 2015-01-06 13:28:34
Can someone provide more testcases?
can anyone explain the testcases. m not able to understand the problem clearly....
Last edit: 2012-02-14 19:20:00